The tradeoff is that others can see how many files are encrypted in your folder (though not their names or contents). It also makes for a more "cloud-friendly" encryption option, as you will be syncing only modified files and not the entire container. This makes encrypted content more resistant to bitrot (as one bad bit can destroy an entire truecrypt container). 10-hour audit that found some security issues of varying severity (thanks tuxaroni)ĮncFS works differently from Truecrypt in that it does not encrypt and mount volumes or "containers", but instead watches a designated folder, and encrypts/decrypts the individual files as-needed using your specified key.MacOS: yes, experimental ( OSXFUSE + EncFS).Windows: yes, experimental ( encfs4win). Supported ciphers: AES, Blowfish, others depending on OS Ports are available to other Operating Systems. It also only supports containers with certain formats and algorithms.ĭescription:Encrypted filesystem that runs in user-space, using FUSE library and Linux kernel modules. It does not manage mounting of truecrypt volumes. TruPax allows you to create and extract truecrypt containers, similar to an archiving utility. Supported ciphers: AES-256, maybe more via command line You can use the template I have below, or just put in a blurb with what you know and I will add it in when I get the chance.ĭescription: Java-based app for creating/managing truecrypt containers built from the ground up. Suggestions are welcome! I will add them to the list in the below format. I will post audit info as well if I come across any (or if you mention it in a post). This forum post is an attempt to sift through the more popular options, and provide some basic info on their capabilities. With the Truecrypt project abandoned, I see a lot of clamoring in comment sections about suitable alternatives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |